Implementation and Results of a Survey on Safe Community Programs in Gangbuk-gu, Korea: Focusing on Participants at a Local Public Health Center

¿¹¹æÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 47±Ç 1È£ p.47 ~ p.56

±èÇöÁß(Kim Hyun-Joong) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Preventive Medicine
Ȳ¼¼¹Î(Hwang Se-Min) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Preventive Medicine
ÀÌÀοµ(Lee In-Young) - Gangbuk Health Center Department of Health Promotion Team
Á¶ÁØÇÊ(Cho Joon-Pil) - Ajou University School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine
±Ç¸í¿Á(Kwon Myoung-Ok) - Korea University Graduate School of Public Health Health Policy and Hospital Management
Á¤ÀçÇå(Jung Jae-Hun) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Preventive Medicine
º¯ÁÖ¿µ(Byun Ju-Young) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of and problems with the Safe Community Programs in Gangbuk-gu, one of the 25 districts of the capital city of Korea.

Methods: The study subjects were 396 individuals who were involved in Safe Community Programs between 2009 and 2011. We examined the effectiveness and willingness of respondents to participate as a safety leader of the Safe Community Program with a questionnaire. We examined the injury death rates of Gangbuk-gu by using of the death certificate data of Korea¡¯s National Statistical Office. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests were used.

Results: The effectiveness of programs did not differ but active participation differed significantly among subjects (p<0.05). The injury death rate of Gangbuk-gu as a whole increased during the implementation period. However, senior safety, in particular, may be a helpful program for reducing injuries in Gangbuk-gu.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the lack of active participation may be a major problem of Safe Community Programs in Gangbuk-gu. Therefore, Safe Community Programs should be expanded to the entire district of Gangbuk-gu and more active participation programs should be developed.

Å°¿öµå

Safe Community, Mortality, Active participation
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå